← Search

Ron Rodgerson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clinton Township, MI
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
38 matches · 9W–29L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history38 matches
W
2023-08-15 · 2PEACH-GAINES MIX18&O 70 SEM F4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Mazurco mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-06-23 · 2PEACH-GAINES MIX18&O 70 SEM F4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Studzinski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-06-09 · 2PEACH-GAINES MIX18&O 70 SEM F4 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Maglicic mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-12-11 · 1PEACH-GAINES 70 MIX 55&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Severyn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2022-12-04 · 1PEACH-GAINES 70 MIX 55&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Maglicic mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-10-30 · 1PEACH-GAINES 70 MIX 55&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Gaines mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2021-10-29 · 4PEACH-GAINES 70 MIX 55&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Swiderski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2021-10-24 · 4PEACH-GAINES 70 MIX 55&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Studzinski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2021-05-15 · #2 Doubles · with Judith Swiderski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2021-04-24 · #3 Doubles · with Laurie Mick mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2021-04-23 · #2 Doubles · with Robyn Parrott mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2021-03-26 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Studzinski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2023
2PEACH-GAINES MIX18&O 70 SEM F4
2023 SEM MIX SUMMER 18 & OVER · 7.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER · 18+
2023
1PEACH-GAINES 70 MIX 55&O SEM
2022 SEM MIX FALL 55 & OVER · 2022 SEM MIXED FALL 55 & OVER 7.0 · 55+
2022
3PEACH-GAINES 80 MIX 55&O SEM
2021 aSEM MIX FALL 55 & OVER · MIX 8.0 55 & OVER SEM · 55+
2021
3PEACH-HOCH 7.0 40&O Mixed SEM F1
2021 SEM SPRING/WINTER MIXED 40 & OVER · 2021 70 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F · 40+
2021
4PEACH-GAINES 70 MIX 55&O SEM
2021 aSEM MIX FALL 55 & OVER · MIX 7.0 55 & OVER SEM · 55+
2021
4PEACH-GAINES 8.0 40&O Mixed SEM F2
2021 SEM SPRING/WINTER MIXED 40 & OVER · 2021 80 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F · 40+
2021
1PEACH-GAINES 40&OVER 70MIX F1
2020 SEM SPRING MIXED 40 & OVER · 2020 70 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F · 40+
2020
2PEACH-GAINES 40&OVER 80MIX F1
2020 SEM SPRING MIXED 40 & OVER · 2020 80 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F · 40+
2020
3PEACH-GAINES 8.0 55 MIX SEM
2020 a SEM MIX 55 & OVER · MIX 8.0 55 & OVER SEM · 55+
2020
3PEACH-GAINES 80mix 18 sem F2
2020 SEM MIX SUMMER 18 & OVER · 8.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER · 18+
2020
4PEACH-GAINES 70mix 18 sem F2
2020 SEM MIX SUMMER 18 & OVER · 7.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER · 18+
2020
5PEACH-PARROTT 7.0 55 MIX SEM
2020 a SEM MIX 55 & OVER · MIX 7.0 55 & OVER SEM · 55+
2020
1PEACH-HOMBREBUENO 35MEN 40 WED SEM F2
2019 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT MEN · 3.5 MEN WED PM SEM · 40+
2019
3PEACH-SANDERS 70 mix 40&O sem f1
2019 SEM WIN MIXED 40 & OVER · 2019 70 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F · 40+
2019
5PEACH-SANDERS 7.0 mix 55 & over sem f1
2019 aSEM MIX 55 & OVER · 7.0 SEM MIX 55 & OVER · 55+
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
5W–15L · 42.9% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 23.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe