← Search

Marji Litwin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Royal Oak, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 111W–129L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history240 matches
W
2026-10-17 · BT-Andrachik 3.5W Fall Singles F2 · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-13 · #1 Doubles · with Constance Carr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-01 · OHCC-Weishaar 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Coffman championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-01 · OHCC-Weishaar 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Coffman championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · DTC-Jacoby (inside) 55s 7.0 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Armiak
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · TROY-Zohoury 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Proefke
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · BT- Waltz 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Chinonis
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · OHCC-Weishaar 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Libby Potter
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-02 · DTC-Jacoby (inside) 55s 7.0 DW F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rochelle Jacoby
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · BT- Waltz 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Chinonis
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · DTC-Jacoby (inside) 55s 7.0 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Hermann
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-23 · BT- Waltz 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Chinonis
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
66.2%
43W–22L · 55.4% of games
3.5
30.5%
25W–57L · 41.4% of games
6.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.7% of games
6.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.6% of games
7.0
45.5%
15W–18L · 45.1% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 37.1% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
47 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe