← Search

Katherine Noser

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 113W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history190 matches
L
2026-10-16 · BRC-Noser 3.5W Fall Singles F3 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-1
L
2026-10-03 · SCWB-Siersma 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Amy Saunders Powers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey MacDonald championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimie Rosner championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meg Iverson championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-30 · BT-Belleau-Mills 55s 7.0 DW F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Lamerato
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · BT-Belleau-Mills 55s 7.0 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Lamerato
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · BT-Cole 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey MacDonald
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · BT-Belleau-Mills 55s 7.0 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Hoyt
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · BRC-Scott 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Lindeblad
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · BT-Cole 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meredith Flynn
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-02 · FAC-Slazinski 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
80.8%
21W–5L · 63.3% of games
3.5
50.6%
42W–41L · 49.7% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 62% of games
6.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 53.2% of games
7.0
66.7%
22W–11L · 55.9% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#2 Singles
16%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
23 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe