← Search

Sue Wadel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gaylord, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 4W–27L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history31 matches
L
2025-10-18 · Team Blewett/Wadel · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patricia Blewett
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-18 · Team Blewett/Wadel · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patricia Blewett
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-12 · Team Lowe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Boisvert
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-12 · Team Lowe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-15 · Team Lowe · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Lyons
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-08-06 · Team Richter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Gorte
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-08-05 · Team Richter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Blewett
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2023-03-11 · Team Waskerwitz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anjuli Hawkins
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-3
L
2022-07-24 · Team Kaufman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eve Elden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-23 · Team Kaufman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eve Elden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-07-17 · Richter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Stallman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-07-16 · Richter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Popper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 43.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
16.7%
3W–15L · 34.5% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe