← Search

Matthew Smith

— year-end
67 matches · 40W–27L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Matthew Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Severo · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Severo · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-03 · Severo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Severo Avila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Severo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shazman Ali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Daniell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
John Rogers / Avery Cornett
2026-07-14 · Carr · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with John David Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · Carr · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kevin Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Daniell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Daniell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · Carr · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with John David Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4
L
2026-06-17 · Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jim Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Carr · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Logan Yerbey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams54 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
80%
12W–3L · 60.7% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 34.6% of games
7.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 54% of games
8.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.6% of games
4.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.3% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova