← Search

Aurora Hibbeler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
The Woodlands, TX
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 70W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history111 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Cole-Causing a Raquet-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Connie Erickson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · Cole-Causing a Raquet-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Connie Erickson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · Cole-Causing a Raquet-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Connie Erickson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · Cole-Causing a Raquet-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Connie Erickson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · Cole-Causing a Raquet-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Connie Erickson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Cole-Causing a Raquet-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paola Tucker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-22 · Wells-Dynamic Doubles-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samira Collado-Yunes
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-08 · Wells-Dynamic Doubles-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candace Yoffe
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-04 · Wells-Dynamic Doubles-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Lindholmer
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-03-19 · Wells - Two-gether Strong - Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dolores Barnhill
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-27 · Wells - Two-gether Strong - Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candace Yoffe
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-05-22 · Wells - Double Duty - Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Polhemus
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.6% of games
4.0
64.3%
54W–30L · 56.6% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 52% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe