← Search

Amanda Nunes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tomball, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 83W–22L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history105 matches
W
2026-10-21 · Battle-Lucky Strings-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Grygar
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Valicevic championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-14 · Battle-Lucky Strings-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Baker
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-09-09 · Eissler-Love Hurts-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen DeLange
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · Eissler-Love Hurts-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaclyn Babcock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Eissler-Love Hurts-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Valerie Eissler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · The Woodlands Alden Bridge · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Zanders
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Woodlands Cranebrook - Pacemakers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Wong
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-12 · Woodlands Cranebrook - Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Burton
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-10 · Dornier-Not My Fault-Woodlands · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Cappello
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-1
W
2026-06-09 · Woodlands Cranebrook - Pacemakers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Hakes
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · Zanders-Net Ninjas-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Buoni championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 62.9% of games
3.5
100%
23W–0L · 69.7% of games
4.0
77.5%
31W–9L · 58.5% of games
6.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.3% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
37 matches
#1 Singles
20%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams