← Search

Rebecca Cappello

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SPRING, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 90W–57L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history147 matches
L
2026-10-16 · Zanders-Net Ninjas-Woodlands Parks · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Biehn championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-16 · Zanders-Net Ninjas-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Biehn championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-07 · Broadbent-Net Setters-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Fralix
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-30 · Broadbent-Net Setters-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Fralix
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · Woodlands Cranebrook - Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suya Rossouw
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-24 · Dornier-Not My Fault-Woodlands · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Baker
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · Woodlands Cranebrook - Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suya Rossouw
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · Woodlands Cranebrook - Net Ninjas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Baker
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · Dornier-Not My Fault-Woodlands · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Nunes
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-1
L
2026-06-03 · Dornier-Not My Fault-Woodlands · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Burton
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · Dornier-Not My Fault-Woodlands · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Griffith
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-01 · The Woodlands Alden Bridge · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Griffith
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 46% of games
3.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 58.9% of games
4.0
61.5%
59W–37L · 53.2% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.3% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
8 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert