← Search

Natalie Hagy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 69W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history102 matches
W
2026-10-27 · Ostlund 4.OMG 18+ ES27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ani Bulbulian
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-10-16 · Lin / Zens: We Thought It Was 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex Chou mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-11 · Double Trouble Hagy RTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Strumpfer
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-10-06 · Ostlund 4.OMG 18+ ES27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Creighton
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-29 · Double Trouble Hagy RTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Strumpfer
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ayumu Kido mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ayumu Kido mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ayumu Kido mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ayumu Kido mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Acers Hagy RTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ani Bulbulian championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-16 · Acers Hagy RTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Strumpfer championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-15 · Acers Hagy RTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Allen championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
81.4%
35W–8L · 66.4% of games
4.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 52.4% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer