Margaret Creighton
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Paul, MN
232 matches · 129W–103L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history232 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2022–2027
Hagen/Gilchrist
Kuberski - Underdogs - 8.0 MXD
Kuberski / Creighton - FORTYfied @ 4.0
Kuberski / Creighton - Mondays R Fun Days - 55+/8.0
LT White Bear Lake Kolenich 11:30am
Ostlund 4.OMG 18+ ES27
2025 Cammack Early Start
Cammack/Leach
Cammack/Leach SUMMER 26
CreighKub Mondays 55 (ES 26)
Creighton Chip & Charge
Creighton Crossover Chargers
Creighton/Kuberski 55+ DAY (Winter26)
Forsythe: Fall Force
Good "win" Gals
Goodwin Girls
Goodwin Girls
Hagen-Gilchrist Summer26
Hagen-Gilchrist Winter
Hagen/Gilchrist ES 2026
Jensen: 40's Summer 26
Jensen: 40's Winter 26
Kuberski - Underdogs
Kuberski_Mixed.55s
LT White Bear Lake Kolenich 11:30am
Northern/Cammack/18&Over4.0W
Northern/Jensen/40&Over4.0W
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 67.7% of games
4.0
48.7%
58W–61L · 50.9% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 64% of games
8.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
63.2%
24W–14L · 56.7% of games
8.0mixed
59.1%
13W–9L · 53.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 23% of the time
#1 Doubles
23%
54 matches
#1 Singles
21%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
41 matches
#2 Singles
13%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.