← Search

Jane Diepenbrock

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Centreville, MD
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 31W–60L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history91 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Cappello · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frances Gamble
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · Cappello · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jodee Hechler
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · Cappello · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jodee Hechler
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-07-06 · Cappello · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally McMahon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2024-07-02 · Cappello · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally McMahon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2024-06-12 · Cappello · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Barnabe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-06-04 · Cappello · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Babette Poyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-05-21 · Cappello · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Barnabe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2023-04-20 · V.Fleischmann · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Chavez
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2023-04-13 · V.Fleischmann · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Sikes
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-11 · J.Diepenbrock · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Maslow
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-03-24 · J.Diepenbrock · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Maslow
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
36.2%
17W–30L · 45.1% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 50.3% of games
6.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 54.9% of games
6.5
28%
7W–18L · 37.2% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe