← Search

Jake Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
320 matches · 179W–141L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history320 matches
L
2026-10-17 · SM- Granger/Osley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chuck Russell
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-26 · Gordon/Sterbenz · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amanda Pratzel mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-26 · Gordon/Sterbenz · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amanda Pratzel mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-09-25 · Gordon/Sterbenz · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amanda Pratzel mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-25 · Gordon/Sterbenz · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amanda Pratzel mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-19 · SM- Granger/Osley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Logan
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · SM- Granger/Osley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shane Kirk
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Hatch championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Floyd Gordon championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-23 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Ollivier
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-09 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juberth John Rabulan
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-02 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Floyd Gordon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.5% of games
4.0
53.5%
53W–46L · 51% of games
4.5
12%
3W–22L · 34.6% of games
7.0mixed
59.1%
13W–9L · 52.6% of games
7.5mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
61.1%
33W–21L · 52.7% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
20W–10L · 56.7% of games
9.0mixed
65.4%
34W–18L · 58.8% of games
9.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
108 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
93 matches
#1 Singles
2%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova