← Search

Janet Burton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Guilford, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 55W–63L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history118 matches
W
2026-10-11 · GF: Mood Swings: Ponvert/Barnes · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Frisbie
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Barnes championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-06 · GF: Fire & Ice: Woods/Farrington · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celia Ponvert
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · (Q) GRSC:Slice Girls:Goodrich/Burton · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eugenia Hayes
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-5
L
2026-04-25 · GF: Fire & Ice: Woods/Farrington · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arlyn Davich
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-19 · (Q) GRSC:Slice Girls:Goodrich/Burton · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eugenia Hayes
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-12 · (Q) GRSC:Slice Girls:Goodrich/Burton · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maureen Goodrich
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-12 · GF: Fire & Ice: Woods/Farrington · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arlyn Davich
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-09 · (Q) GRSC:Slice Girls:Goodrich/Burton · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Frisbie
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-03-29 · (Q) GRSC:Slice Girls:Goodrich/Burton · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Walden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-22 · GF: Fire & Ice: Woods/Farrington · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Barnes
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · (Q) GRSC:Slice Girls:Goodrich/Burton · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Piironen
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 41% of games
4.0
48.3%
28W–30L · 49.5% of games
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 48% of games
8.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams