← Search

Alan Ogilvie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Katy, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
265 matches · 113W–152L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history265 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Woodlands Ridgewood - Dream Team 2.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annie Lindholmer mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-10-11 · Woodlands Ridgewood - Dream Team 2.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dolores Cos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-16 · Woodlands Cranebrook - Hussain-Cos Hard Hitters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammy Rogers mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · Woodlands Cranebrook - Hussain-Cos Hard Hitters · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammy Rogers mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · Team 1 Triple Threat · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shayna Ginster mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-24 · Team 1 Triple Threat · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shayna Ginster mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-28 · Team 1 Triple Threat · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shayna Ginster mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-11-02 · Team 5 Zaret - Doubles Espresso · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Vanessa Ogilvie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-11 · Team 3 Fun Bunch · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andre Archilla
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-11 · Team 5 Zaret - Doubles Espresso · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Vanessa Ogilvie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-04 · Team 3 Fun Bunch · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andre Archilla
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-09-22 · Team 3 Fun Bunch · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Kim
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.1% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.7%
41W–30L · 53% of games
4.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.4% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 56.1% of games
8.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 49% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 41.5% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
26W–52L · 44.7% of games
8.5mixed
40%
6W–9L · 42.5% of games
9.0mixed
17.9%
5W–23L · 34.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
113 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
108 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
44 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe