← Search

Vanessa Ogilvie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Katy, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
343 matches · 129W–214L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history343 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Woodlands Ridgewood - Dream Team 2.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edgar Arceo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · Woodlands Ridgewood - Dream Team 2.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edgar Arceo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
Default
2026-10-11 · Woodlands Ridgewood - Dream Team 2.0 · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edgar Arceo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-12 · Hill-Hilltop Hitters-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Curry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-31 · Team 7 Mad Ranchers 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-25 · Ogilvie - Morning Sets · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leigh Neary
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-0
W
2026-03-04 · Ogilvie - Morning Sets · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Danner
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-13 · Team 7 Mad Ranchers 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Sendich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-3
W
2026-01-21 · Ogilvie - Morning Sets · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Danner
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-3
W
2025-11-02 · Team 1 Causing A Racket · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tracey White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-11-02 · Team 5 Zaret - Doubles Espresso · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alan Ogilvie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-26 · Team 1 Causing A Racket · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tracey White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams171 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.4% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 39.1% of games
4.0
83.3%
25W–5L · 66.4% of games
4.5
28.7%
35W–87L · 41.6% of games
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.1% of games
8.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 63.8% of games
8.5
35.5%
11W–20L · 43.7% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
4.5mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 38.3% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.1% of games
8.0mixed
28.9%
13W–32L · 41.2% of games
8.5mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 39.5% of games
9.0mixed
15.4%
4W–22L · 35.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
115 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
98 matches
#1 Singles
7%
23 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer