Search

Rebecca McMasters

HERMOSA BEACH, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
119 matches · 68W–51L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.43
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
81%
down to 3.5
19%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 55% down · 45% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.49. Higher than today’s 3.43 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
CA · 4.0
12 of 12

Rebecca is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams76 teams · 2009–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rebecca has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Rebecca has gone from the 45th to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.7% of games
3.5
73.5%
25W–9L · 57.5% of games
4.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.1% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history119 matches
L
Kirsten Helvey / Mary Stiles
2026-07-26 · BC-WestEnd/ColleenJohnson8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Rogers
0.011below expectation — took 42% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Jennifer Siegal / James Noh
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with William Burns
0.058below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Monika Kiznis / Tammy Hoffman
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aileen Kizlinski
+0.002about as expected — took 42% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Supriya Sunder Rajan / Andrea Torng
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yukiko Hawley
0.023below expectation — took 28% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aimee Kuan
0.011better than expected — took 100% of games against 87% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Kristen Finn / Kimberly Graham
2026-05-31 · BC-WestEnd/ColleenJohnson8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Hirata
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Miki Heinonen / Aki Mogi
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Devin McMasters
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Georgia Cano / Christeen Field
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Freni
0.006below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Jill Halkias / Frances Hong
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aileen Kizlinski
+0.034better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Stacy Goldate / Elizabeth Burrows
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Tran
+0.006about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Buck Snyder / Becky McGilley
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Devin McMasters
+0.004about as expected — took 39% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Aki Takeda / Chiaki Maeda
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noreen Wenjen
0.024below expectation — took 32% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.