← Search

Kirsten Helvey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manhattan Beach, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
208 matches · 131W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history208 matches
L
2026-10-25 · BC-MCC/SarahSautot4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Sautot
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-23 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Stephens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-11 · BC-MCC/SarahSautot4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Nedelman
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · BC-MCC/SarahSautot4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Harrington
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · BC-MCC/SarahSautot4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanette Chun
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Stephens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-13 · BC-MCC/SarahSautot4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Nedelman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-11 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · BC-MCC/MonikaKiznis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Harrington
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · BC-MCC/KariCarpino8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Stiles
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Matthew Luce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · BC-MCC/MonikaKiznis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Harrington
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.9% of games
3.5
77.4%
48W–14L · 63.1% of games
4.0
53.1%
34W–30L · 53.8% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 52% of games
0.0mixed
77.8%
14W–4L · 55.7% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 55% of games
4.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.2% of games
8.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
33 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova