← Search

Matthew Luce

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manhattan Beach, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 31W–42L · seasons 2022–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-10-18 · BC-MCC/KariCarpino7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne DeMartini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-04 · BC-MCC/KariCarpino7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Veronica Deutsch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-10-02 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Coit mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-31 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivy Charlton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-25 · BC-MCC/MikeYogi8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Coit mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirsten Helvey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · BC-MCC/MikeYogi8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Schlager mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · BC-MCC/SpencerTrotta · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Simpson
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · BC-MCC/SpencerTrotta · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajeev Rao
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-08 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivy Charlton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-02 · BC-MCC/SpencerTrotta · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Mardis
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-01 · BC-MCC/BenDunbar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Coit mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
42.5%
17W–23L · 45.6% of games
2.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer