← Search

Debra Kosko

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 8W–15L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history23 matches
L
2024-08-06 · Boughter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Krenzer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-07-30 · Boughter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Krenzer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-24 · Boughter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Krenzer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-25 · Boughter · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Alfieri
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2023-08-15 · Boughter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neerja Bhatnagar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-08-08 · Boughter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fauna Pappalardo-Minges
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2023-07-18 · Boughter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fauna Pappalardo-Minges
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-0
W
2023-07-11 · Boughter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Boughter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2021-05-27 · Pappalardo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Patterson
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-5
W
2021-05-20 · Pappalardo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Mirsky
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-01-10 · Boughter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Keegan
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2020-12-13 · Boughter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Couture
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.3% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 56% of the time
#2 Doubles
56%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert