Janet Mirsky
31 matches · 18W–13L · seasons 2019–2021
Captains: add Janet Mirsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history31 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Brenda Harvey / Catherine Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams5 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.6% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 31% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Champions keep playing until they get it right.