← Search

Pam Landis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
338 matches · 200W–138L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history338 matches
W
2026-10-20 · Landis/Reddmann/LR/PVCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Piechocki
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-09-15 · Landis/Reddmann/LR/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Frazier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Landis/Reddmann/LR/PVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christine Castillo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · Sanders/Harrison/HS/LRAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Rojas
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-6
L
2026-07-26 · Anderson/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Anderson/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Cisne championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Cisne championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams88 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
69.1%
103W–46L · 58.9% of games
4.25
85.7%
6W–1L · 62% of games
4.5
27%
10W–27L · 38.7% of games
7.5
68.5%
37W–17L · 54.2% of games
8.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 42.9% of games
4.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 45.1% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 60.6% of games
8.0mixed
70%
14W–6L · 53.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
116 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
115 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
86 matches
Singles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova