← Search

Lisa Titus

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Berkeley, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 101W–79L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history180 matches
L
2026-10-04 · CLAREMONT R and S CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Forooza Baradar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-25 · CLAREMONT R and S CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erinn Nahid
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-20 · CLAREMONT R and S CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Kung
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ina Bendich
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ina Bendich
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bella Buster
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Kavelaars
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Gabato
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-12 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Kavelaars
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Euna Roh
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-28 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Kavelaars
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 66.3% of games
4.0
53.8%
42W–36L · 51.5% of games
4.5
25%
4W–12L · 36.5% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 70.3% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
7.5
52.6%
20W–18L · 51.7% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
33 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer