← Search

Susan Kung

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Berkeley, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 87W–70L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history157 matches
W
2026-11-01 · CLAREMONT R and S CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anita Bloch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-10-24 · CLAREMONT R and S CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Molly Kennedy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-10-10 · CLAREMONT R and S CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Wheeler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-25 · CLAREMONT R and S CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alicia Kavelaars
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-20 · CLAREMONT R and S CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Titus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Forooza Baradar championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Forooza Baradar championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · CLAREMONT R and S 40MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Cheyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-01 · CLAREMONT R and S 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Finley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-11 · CLAREMONT R and S 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Kennedy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Wiellette
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW3.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Forooza Baradar
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
58.5%
24W–17L · 52.2% of games
3.0
81%
17W–4L · 64.2% of games
3.5
43.5%
20W–26L · 45.8% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 46.9% of games
6.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 47.4% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 45.6% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#1 Singles
15%
24 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert