Search

Jason Borgida

Monroe, WA
3.0C year-end 2023
45 matches · 30W–15L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Monroe · 3.0
4 of 5
WA · 3.0
807 of 1107

Jason is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jason has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jason has gone from the 91st to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 61.3% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history45 matches
W
Chris Vyvyan-robinson / Abhi Veerabahu
2026-03-15 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.0 · with Aidan Drake
+0.046better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-2
L
Nikolo Vo / Sagar Reddi
2026-03-08 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.0 · with Aidan Drake
0.017below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3
W
Vincent Srey / Justin Hedrick
2026-02-07 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.0 · with Aidan Drake
+0.051better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-2
L
Trevor Shibley / Ephraim Baclagan
2026-01-04 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.0 · with Aidan Drake
0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2
L
2023-06-10 · #1 Doubles · with Zoltan Williamson
+0.018better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ted Krammer
+0.014about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Joseph Gregory / Casey Bui
2023-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Sciranko
0.032below expectation — took 41% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2023-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hugo Aponte
0.001about as expected — took 65% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Robert Welland / Scott Whelan
2023-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Busby
+0.048better than expected — took 55% of games against 37% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Brown
+0.018better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zoltan Williamson
+0.057better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Elizabeth Liu
0.038below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.