← Search

Jordan Hill

Redmond, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 57W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jordan Hill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-05-01 · MC-M 4.5-Purganan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-25 · MC-M 4.5-Purganan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zachary Chai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · MC-M 4.5-Purganan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Shen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-16 · MC-Smash Potatoes-Lim · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karla Franco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-26 · MC-Smash Potatoes-Lim · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Min Park mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-27 · MC-Smash Potatoes-Lim · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jasmine Wijaya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-01 · MC-Purganan M 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sid Sanyal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-17 · MC-Purganan M 4.5 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-05-04 · MC-Purganan M 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Liao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-03 · MC-Purganan M 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ramanuja Atur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-04-19 · MC-Purganan M 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Shen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-12 · MC-Purganan M 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Florian Purganan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
81%
17W–4L · 65.6% of games
4.5
52%
13W–12L · 45.9% of games
4.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 48.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 46.6% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
15 matches
#1 Male Doubles
6%
6 matches
#1 Male Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe