← Search

Rhonda Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 156W–88L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history244 matches
L
2026-09-27 · KY/LEX/Parrish/Morrow · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Bowden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-24 · KY/LEX/Parrish/Morrow · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Bowden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · KY/LEX/Coy · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janine Coy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-23 · KY/LEX/Parrish/Morrow · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paige Bensing
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · KY/LEX/Kitchin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Scates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · KY/LEX/Kitchin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Cassagne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-25 · KY/LEX/Francisco/Cassagne/Barroso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Atkinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · KY/LEX/Francisco/Cassagne/Barroso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with J Peter Cassidy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-17 · KY/LEX/Francisco/Cassagne/Barroso · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Hamann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-25 · KY/LEX/Francisco/Cassagne/Barroso · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with J Peter Cassidy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
Default
2026-06-11 · KY/LEX/Kitchin · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Pinkston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Georgeanna Chapman championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.2% of games
4.0
73.9%
68W–24L · 59.5% of games
4.5
42.6%
20W–27L · 47.3% of games
7.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.1% of games
8.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 52.2% of games
4.0mixed
78.9%
15W–4L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
16W–14L · 52.6% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
60 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer