← Search

Zach Young

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
277 matches · 194W–83L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history277 matches
L
2026-10-18 · KY/LEX/Bantz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Bantz
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-10-14 · KY/LEX/Bantz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Evans
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joey Mckinney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joe Ross
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joey Mckinney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooks Harrison
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily F Whitnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Beth Waterman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Wampler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Schrass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Wampler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Schrass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
100%
14W–0L · 65.8% of games
3.5
77.9%
81W–23L · 62.1% of games
4.0
56.5%
48W–37L · 54.5% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 40.2% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 57.9% of games
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.4% of games
7.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 57.3% of games
0.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.7% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
120 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
64 matches
#1 Singles
14%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
39 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova