← Search

Adam Bantz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 140W–98L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history238 matches
W
Default
2026-10-27 · KY/LEX/Bantz · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-18 · KY/LEX/Bantz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zach Young
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-10-03 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ravi Raithatha
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-23 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ravi Raithatha
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ravi Raithatha
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · KY/LEX/Nakata · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace McGonigle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-02 · KY/LEX/Nakata · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace McGonigle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · KY/LEX/Nakata · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace McGonigle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · KY/LEX/Nakata · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kylie Russ mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · KY/LEX/Nakata · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hiroko Nakata mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlie Politi
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-16 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlie Politi
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
74.1%
20W–7L · 61.6% of games
4.0
60%
75W–50L · 54.5% of games
4.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 40.8% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 70.1% of games
7.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 61.8% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 55.6% of games
4.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.9% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 45.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
102 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
33 matches
#1 Singles
6%
15 matches
#2 Singles
6%
14 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams