← Search

Jim Baker

Meridian, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 62W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Baker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Mallory mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Mallory mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Small mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Racket Posse 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · Racket Posse 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Davin Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-02 · Racket Posse 18+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Hallingstad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-19 · Racket Posse 18+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Davin Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-11 · Racket Posse · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-20 · Racket Posse · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Micah Vogt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · Double the Fun · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Small mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-15 · Racket Posse · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Davin Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-06 · Racket Posse · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Bidou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
60.9%
28W–18L · 54% of games
7.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 51% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 53.3% of games
6.5mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.6% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
18W–15L · 49.3% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
37 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova