← Search

Stacie Hogan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Park City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 26W–35L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history61 matches
L
2026-02-23 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Cooley & Wright · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Gillen
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-19 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Cooley & Wright · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Gillen
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-07 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/E Cooley & J Wright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katie Buechel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-27 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/E Cooley & J Wright · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Day
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-26 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/E Cooley & J Wright · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katie Buechel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-24 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/E Cooley & J Wright · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elaine Reddick-Cooley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-2
L
2025-02-17 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/E Cooley & J Wright · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Creager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-04 · CV-Rancho La Quinta /N Anderson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Day
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-26 · CV-Rancho La Quinta /N Anderson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Skrobut
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-12 · CV-Rancho La Quinta /N Anderson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Creager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-15 · CV-Rancho La Quinta /N Anderson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Creager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-01-15 · CV-Rancho La Quinta /N Anderson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Haley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 52.2% of games
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 40.2% of games
6.0
75%
6W–2L · 62.1% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
36.7%
11W–19L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe