← Search

Alicia Watkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
328 matches · 218W–110L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history328 matches
L
2026-09-10 · ACAC 10sBradts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Bradt
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-09 · SCC- Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Andrews
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · SCC- Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Andrews
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-31 · ACAC 10sBradts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Bradt
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · SCC- Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Andrews
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · ACAC 10sBradts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Weisberg
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-18 · SCC- Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Tornabene
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Farnsworth championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Weisberg championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Farnsworth championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Weisberg championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · SCC- Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Andrews
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams88 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
66.3%
110W–56L · 55.8% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 45.3% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 69.1% of games
7.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 53.2% of games
8.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 65.1% of games
7.0mixed
63.3%
19W–11L · 53.2% of games
7.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
73.9%
34W–12L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
157 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
102 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
64 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova