← Search

Donna Bearman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 138W–92L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history230 matches
W
2026-11-03 · Double Trouble - Racelis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Oatts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-10 · Westwood - Payne/Hassett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kacie Painter
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-31 · Westwood - Payne/Hassett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lil Racelis
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Westwood 55 Ladies - Gilman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with SanDee Gammon
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Westwood - Payne/Hassett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lil Racelis
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · 19 Westwood Farney/VanTuyle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with SanDee Gammon
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · Westwood 55 Ladies - Gilman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with SanDee Gammon
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-24 · 19 Westwood Farney/VanTuyle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with SanDee Gammon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · Westwood 55 Ladies - Gilman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with SanDee Gammon
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · 19 Westwood Farney/VanTuyle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with SanDee Gammon
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Westwood 55 Ladies - Gilman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Quinn
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-4
W
2026-05-30 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lil Racelis
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
66.3%
63W–32L · 54.3% of games
4.0
23.3%
7W–23L · 38.6% of games
7.0
81.8%
27W–6L · 58.2% of games
7.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 57.9% of games
7.5mixed
50%
10W–10L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
117 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
24 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe