Search

Jill Snow

Sammamish, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
98 matches · 51W–47L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
96%
stay 3.0
4%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.81. Lower than today’s 2.86 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 3.0
14 of 17
WA · 3.0
491 of 755

Jill is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams48 teams · 2010–2027
PL-Day
2027 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2027
PL-Baby Got Backhand-Buck
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
PL-Snow
2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0
2026
PL-LaMoria
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
NWW-PL-Snow
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0
2025
PL-LaMoria
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jill has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jill has gone from the 6th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
61.3%
19W–12L · 51.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.1% of games
6.0mixed
54.8%
17W–14L · 51.1% of games
7.0mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-07-19 · PL-Snow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Zhao
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Yumi Roberts / Bonnie Flock
2026-04-29 · PL-Baby Got Backhand-Buck · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eloisa Tang
0.016below expectation — took 47% of games against 56% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Shelley Buhler / Corinne Crabs
2026-04-09 · PL-Baby Got Backhand-Buck · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Walker
0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Adam Hrebeniuk / Huijuan Zhangchamps
2025-09-20 · PL-LaMoria · #3 Doubles · with Joe Stanley
0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-08-09 · NWW-PL-Snow · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Zhao
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/Amixed
2025-07-06 · NWW-PL-Snow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Zhao
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 84% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Kayla Fisher / Tammy Antezana
2025-05-20 · PL-LaMoria · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Small
+0.047better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Kim Eli / Sheila King
2025-04-29 · PL-LaMoria · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Miller
0.015below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Meredith Helmick / Laura Naden
2025-04-08 · PL-LaMoria · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Miller
0.035below expectation — took 47% of games against 62% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Paulette Boyle / Shannon Cabraja
2025-03-25 · PL-LaMoria · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Wate
+0.005better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Seungwon Lee / Luisa Gass
2025-02-22 · PL-LaMoria · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kriss Wells
0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-6
L
Janice Walters / Erin Oest-Larsen
2025-02-01 · PL-LaMoria · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kriss Wells
0.024below expectation — took 38% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.