Search

Liliana Abbott

SAN DIEGO, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
87 matches · 26W–61L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.26
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 44 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
CA · 3.5
140 of 167
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Liliana is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Liliana has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Liliana has gone from the 18th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
27.3%
12W–32L · 43.1% of games
4.0
26.9%
7W–19L · 39.3% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 44.9% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 44.7% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history87 matches
W
Cheryl Shah / Jill McKee
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erica Meyer
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Blacker
+0.032better than expected — took 38% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Almira MacIas / Lisa Mallory
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irene Steinwinder
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Jackson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
L
Rosie Wagner / Celia Hernandez
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Dube
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Amaral
0.017below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Melissa Kroeger / Kim Latham
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Howell
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
L
Kara West / Denise le Feuvre
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Jackson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
5-2
L
Lisa Mallory / Pam Trent
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Niddrie
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
Janene Christopher / Mary Thomas
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Jackson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Jacqueline Allen / Kim Slaaf
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Klaudia Kapinos
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-4
L
Irma Ibarra / Natalia Rodriguez Oteiza
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Yu-Hansen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.