← Search

Cheryl Shah

San Diego, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 42W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Shah to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-09-10 · SD 3.5 La Jolla TC/ Bruno · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Reilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-4
W
2026-08-29 · SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ Bruton · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amit Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-02 · SD 7.0 FRCC/ Hackett · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill McKee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ Bruton · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amit Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
Julie Martin / Dung Ngo
2026-07-25 · SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ Bruton · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amit Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · SD 7.0 FRCC/ Hackett · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Junli Feng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Voeffray · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Voeffray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ Bruton · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amit Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Voeffray · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Heiman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · SDNC 3.5 RPTC (3PM)/ Erenea · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Junli Feng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · SD 4.0 Barnes TC (3:2)/ Bucky · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-24 · SDNC 3.5 RPTC (3PM)/ Erenea · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chau Hutcheson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
19W–19L · 48.3% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 26.9% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
60.6%
20W–13L · 54.1% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#1 Singles
17%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer