← Search

Cheryl Shah

San Diego, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
82 matches · 40W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.32
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
San Diego · 3.5
63 of 77
CA · 3.5
126 of 167
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Cheryl is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cheryl has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Cheryl has gone from the 38th to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
48.6%
17W–18L · 47.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 35% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
59.4%
19W–13L · 53.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill McKee
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Douglas Kenyon / Andrea Goodwinmixed
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amit Shah
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
Julie Martin / Dung Ngomixed
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amit Shah
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Junli Feng
+0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jill Twombly / Mary Beth Woulfe
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Voeffray
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amit Shah
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Margie Jones / Michelle Atkinson
2026-06-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Heiman
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-3
W
Daiva Gedgaudas / Birgitte Bradshaw
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Junli Feng
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
Amy Hamric
2026-05-29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 7-5
L
Kara Hatch / Celine Trussell
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chau Hutcheson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 7-5
W
Laurie Dunn / Joe Manheimmixed
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amit Shah
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-22 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.019below expectation — took 0% of games against 24% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.