← Search

Sarah Tilt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bozeman, MT
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
12 matches · 6W–6L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history12 matches
L
2026-09-04 · Q team · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andy Hauser mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-03 · Q team · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andy Hauser mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-27 · For the love of the game · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Nicholson
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2021-08-07 · Bozeman Team · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina Barham
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-08-07 · Bozeman Team · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susie Luebbe
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2021-08-06 · Bozeman Team · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sunny Cook
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2019-08-23 · Tri-Fecta · #1 Doubles · with Susie Luebbe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2019-07-19 · Tri-Fecta · #1 Doubles · with Susie Luebbe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2019-06-28 · Tri-Fecta · #1 Doubles · with Susie Luebbe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2019-06-28 · Qualifying team · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ann Waters
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2019-06-27 · Qualifying team · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ann Waters
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2019-06-20 · Tri-Fecta · #1 Doubles · with Susie Luebbe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.1% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe