← Search

Nancy Harper

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Granger, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 16W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history49 matches
L
2026-08-01 · NIN SB 55&O 6.0 W: SBRC Neumann · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ida Watson championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · NIN SB 55&O 6.0 W: SBRC Neumann · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathryn Bernel
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · NIN SB 55&O 6.0 W: SBRC Neumann · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Neumann
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · NIN SB 55&O 6.0 W: SBRC Neumann · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ida Watson
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rachel Oppman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
Judi Howard / Li Dong
2025-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Engel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rachel Oppman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rachel Oppman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rachel Oppman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Li Dong / Judi Howard
2025-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Casetti
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ida Watson
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Neumann
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
29.6%
8W–19L · 41.5% of games
6.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Singles
14%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe