Yumiko Hawke
95 matches · 42W–53L · seasons 2023–2026
Captains: add Yumiko Hawke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history95 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Cassandra Etter / Michele Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
Kim Gibson / Margaret Woolverton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Patricia Lee / Maxine Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
TCT: 3.0 Racquettes Spring 40: Buschauer
TCT: Love 2 Play: Eustace/Adams
TCT:Dare Doubles:Nelson/Hawke
TCT:Dare Doubles:Nelson/Hawke
TCT:Make Mine A Double:Nelson
TCT:Make Mine a Double:Nelson
TCT:Mixed Double Shots:Donnelly/Swan
TCT:Mixed Double Shots:Nelson/Swan
TCT:The Game Changers:Hawley/Schoffstall
TCT:The Game Changers:Hawley/Scoffstall
TCT:Truth or Dare Doubles:Esposito
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
44.4%
28W–35L · 50% of games
6.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 43.8% of games
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.