← Search

Matthew Berger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Danbury, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 122W–77L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history199 matches
W
2026-11-01 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Ray
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-25 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian McCauley
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-24 · MRC:All Mixed Up:Islam · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Avari mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-03 · MRC:Hawley/Berger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Hawley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-03 · MRC:All Mixed Up:Islam · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Silvia Islam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-09-27 · MRC:Hawley/Berger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Hawley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Ray championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian McCauley championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Zinser championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-16 · MRC:Hawley/Berger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Silvia Islam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · MRC:Hawley/Berger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Hawley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · MRC:Hawley/Berger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Demeyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
61%
61W–39L · 55% of games
7.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
56.8%
46W–35L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
75 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
29 matches
#1 Singles
8%
15 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer