← Search

Brian McCauley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Milford, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
186 matches · 95W–91L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history186 matches
W
2026-10-25 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Berger
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-24 · MRC:Matchmakers:Kinoshita · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Rose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-26 · MRC:Matchmakers:Kinoshita · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leigh Libero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-6
W
2026-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neil Gardner championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Berger championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis DiPinto championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-1
W
2026-08-16 · NMT: Acing Gracefully: Rose · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Penny Schmitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · NMT: Acing Gracefully: Rose · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Conklin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · NMT: Acing Gracefully: Rose · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Lefebvre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · MRC: Senior Service:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Rose
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · MRC:Net Prophets:Hill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Vongsouvanh
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-06 · MRC:Net Prophets:Hill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Berger
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
54.7%
47W–39L · 52.3% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 41.1% of games
7.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 47.9% of games
7.0mixed
52.2%
36W–33L · 53.1% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal