← Search

Salman Muslim

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Stamford, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 41W–45L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history86 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NC:Not My Faults 3.5:Woo/Mahajan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danne Woo
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · NC:Not My Faults 3.5:Woo/Mahajan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pankaj Jha
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-10-24 · SOL:Fine Wine:Woolwine/Fine · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Lesser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-11 · SOL:Fine Wine:Woolwine/Fine · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Carroll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · SOL:Fine Wine:Woolwine/Fine · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Woolwine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · NC:Not My Faults:Woo/Mahajan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan O'Rourk
loading the estimate
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · NC:Not My Faults:Woo/Mahajan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Prateek Gahoi
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-11 · NC:Not My Faults:Woo/Mahajan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan O'Rourk
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · NC:Not My Faults:Woo/Mahajan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dmitry Korsun
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · NC:Not My Faults:Woo/Mahajan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan O'Rourk
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-30 · NC:Not My Faults:Woo/Mahajan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Kittredge
loading the estimate
1-0
W
2026-05-09 · NC:Not My Faults:Woo/Mahajan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anil Erdem
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 62.6% of games
3.5
31%
9W–20L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
51.5%
17W–16L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer