← Search

Alan Zinser

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Woodbury, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 19W–8L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history27 matches
W
2026-09-18 · MRC: Senior Service:Berger/McCauley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Berger championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
Default
2026-04-26 · MRC: Senior Service:Berger/McCauley · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Hill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-29 · MRC: Senior Service:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Berger
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Berger
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-27 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Berger
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
Default
2026-02-15 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pierre Antoine Dourneau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-08-03 · MRC:SpinMasters:Schwarz/Quinn · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Taylor
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-21 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Miller
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-16 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Miller
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-11-24 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Miller
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-11-03 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Miller
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-09-29 · MRC:Racquet Scientists:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Berger
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 59% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 74% of the time
#1 Doubles
74%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams