← Search

Marcia Hamelin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RIDGEFIELD, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 90W–82L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history172 matches
L
2026-10-24 · WRC:One Hit Wonders:Hamelin · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Lang
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-04 · WRC: Mixed Nuts: Hamelin/Eliseenkova · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Downer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-28 · WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Hamelin/ Eliseenkova · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claire Hurley
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kay Spencer championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Jennings championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Castro championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · WRC: Mixed Nuts: Hamelin/Eliseenkova · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Downer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-27 · WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Hamelin/Eliseenkova · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Bento
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · WRC: Volley Vixens Summer:Spencer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellyn Ulfsson
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · WRC:One Hit Wonders:Hamelin · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Zirn
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · WRC: Volley Vixens Summer:Spencer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Huang
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · WRC:One Hit Wonders:Hamelin · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Dalinka
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
54.3%
51W–43L · 52.7% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 53.3% of games
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.5% of games
7.0
60%
18W–12L · 52.8% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
19%
4W–17L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
40 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal