← Search

Claire Gallagher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ossining, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 111W–90L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history201 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Armonk Tennis Club: Honey Deuces 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Woodworth
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-25 · Gin & Taconic · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Gosniowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-10-15 · Armonk Tennis Club: Honey Deuces 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Woodworth
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-05 · Armonk Tennis Club: Honey Deuces 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Woodworth
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-18 · Armonk Tennis Club: Honey Deuces 18+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Pedersen
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Daly
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · Pleasantville Tennis Club 40+ 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Olney
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Pleasantville Tennis Club 40+ 3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marielise Watts
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Olney
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Chappaqua Swim & Tennis 3.5 18+W - Drop Shot Divas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Olney
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · Pleasantville Tennis Club 40+ 3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Olney
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-21 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toby Amidor
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
67.4%
29W–14L · 55.7% of games
3.5
47.3%
52W–58L · 49.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
7.0mixed
59.5%
25W–17L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
79 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
50 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer