← Search

Terry Nolan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Milford, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 76W–64L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history140 matches
L
2026-10-25 · MIT:Dream Team:Nava/Nolan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arla Wiles
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-18 · MIT:Dream Team:Nava/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Tralies Walsky
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-09 · MIT:Aceing Gracefully:DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maggie Nava
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Nava
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-4
L
2026-06-27 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amelie Vanier
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antonina Korepina
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amelie Vanier
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stefanie Kreiger
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-06 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chihwa Tang
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-26 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Cannella
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Atkins
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-22 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with CHRISTINE CHARLES
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
51.2%
44W–42L · 51.1% of games
7.0
59.4%
19W–13L · 54% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
21 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King