← Search

Lynn Atkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Stratford, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 55W–34L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history89 matches
W
2026-11-01 · MIT:Dream Team:Nava/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Bastarache
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-31 · MIT:Smashed:Montanaro/Milano · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Kelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-25 · MIT:Dream Team:Nava/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Tralies Walsky
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-17 · MIT:Smashed:Montanaro/Milano · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Kraft mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stefanie Kreiger
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Tralies Walsky
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-6
W
2026-07-11 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stefanie Kreiger
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Tralies Walsky
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nadine Morandi
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-17 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Bastarache
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Nolan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Nava/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Nava
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
58.5%
31W–22L · 51.3% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.5% of games
7.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 59% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer