← Search

Maggie Nava

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shelton, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 93W–73L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history166 matches
W
2026-11-01 · MIT:Dream Team:Nava/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Pillig
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-25 · MIT:Dream Team:Nava/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Antonina Korepina
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-23 · MIT:40+ Mixed 7.0:Kreiger/Lorenzetti · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henrik McVoy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-09 · MIT:Aceing Gracefully:DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terry Nolan
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Haven championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Nolan
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-4
L
2026-07-19 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Tralies Walsky
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobbi Deangelis
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Antonina Korepina
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-07-11 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Roper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Lareau
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Bacon
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
59.8%
55W–37L · 53.8% of games
4.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 42.6% of games
7.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 54.7% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal