← Search

Henrik McVoy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Milford, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 46W–75L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history121 matches
L
2026-10-25 · MIT:3.0 40+:McVoy / Lorenzetti · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suresh Ramamoorthy
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-23 · MIT:40+ Mixed 7.0:Kreiger/Lorenzetti · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Nava mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-18 · MIT:3.0 40+:McVoy / Lorenzetti · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lalit Madan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-11 · MIT:40+ Mixed 6.0:Sikora/Lorenzetti · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · MIT:3.0 40+:McVoy / Lorenzetti · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lalit Madan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-10-04 · MIT:40+ Mixed 7.0:Kreiger/Lorenzetti · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Haven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-18 · MIT:40+ Mixed 7.0:Kreiger/Lorenzetti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Nyklicek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-11 · MIT:40+ Mixed 6.0:Sikora/Lorenzetti · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ewelina Sikora mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · MIT: Milford Indoor Tennis: Mcvoy/Lorenzetti · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shubham Kashikar championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · MIT: Milford Indoor Tennis: Mcvoy/Lorenzetti · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sachin Girdhar championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · MIT: Milford Indoor Tennis: Mcvoy/Lorenzetti · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shubham Kashikar
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · MIT: Milford Indoor Tennis: Mcvoy/Lorenzetti · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shubham Kashikar
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
42.1%
24W–33L · 46.1% of games
6.0mixed
36.7%
18W–31L · 43.3% of games
7.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova