← Search

Janice Lareau

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fairfield, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 24W–19L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history43 matches
W
2026-07-12 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chihwa Tang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Bacon
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Nava
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with CHRISTINE CHARLES
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-20 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Patzelt
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-03 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Montanaro
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Nava/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kat Carangelo
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-08 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Nava/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Patzelt
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-11-09 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Nava/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with CHRISTINE CHARLES
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-07-27 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Nava
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-06-29 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Bastarache
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-06-21 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kat Carangelo
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
54.1%
20W–17L · 52.6% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
42%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova