← Search

Katherine Kalaydjian

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomfield Hills, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 40W–43L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history83 matches
L
2026-10-24 · BT- Jennett 65s 7.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Read championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-23 · BT- Jennett 65s 7.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Read championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · BT- Jennett 65s 7.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Read
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · BT- Jennett 65s 7.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Capasso
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · BT- Jennett 65s 7.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Capasso
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-05 · 2SCWB-OCONNER 70DW TH 55&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Hodges championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-07 · 2SCWB-OCONNER 70DW TH 55&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Nunez
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-20 · 4BT-HELLER 70DW FRI 65&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Street
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-19 · 2SCWB-OCONNER 70DW TH 55&O SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Street
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-06-12 · 4SCWB-outside-LESNAU 35DW TH 18&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacie Rein
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-05-22 · 4SCWB-outside-LESNAU 35DW TH 18&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Lesnau
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-08 · 3SCWB-WEISS AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Street
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
57.1%
24W–18L · 52.7% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 37% of games
7.0
43.8%
14W–18L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 54% of the time
#2 Doubles
54%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert